The Studio Suite: booked, signed, current, counted
The same four things happen at the front of a studio every day, and most operators pay four subscriptions for them. $326.00 apart, $199.00 together. Two of the four make an engineering claim rather than a feature claim, and this page explains what to test in the demo before believing either.
At the front of a studio, gym or spa, the same four things happen in order, every single time someone walks in. They book a slot. They sign something before the class starts. Someone checks that their membership or class pack is actually current. And then they walk through a door that somebody is responsible for accounting for. Four jobs, and most operators run four separate pieces of software to cover them, each with its own login, its own bill and its own idea of what "today" looks like. The Studio Suite is the same four jobs bought as one: Slotly for the booking, Waiverly for the signature, Gymora for the membership, and Visitora for the door.
Try the Slotly demo ↗Live, on sample data, no sign-up.
What the four do, and what each costs alone
| Product | Job | Single licence |
|---|---|---|
| Slotly | Appointment booking engineered so it cannot double-book | $99.00 |
| Waiverly | Digital waivers with a minor/guardian gate and tamper-evident records | $79.00 |
| Gymora | Gym membership manager with front-desk check-in guards and class-pack credit tracking | $69.00 |
| Visitora | Evacuation list for reception and site safety -- one page naming everyone still inside | $79.00 |
Bought one at a time, that is $326.00 (arithmetic: 99 + 79 + 69 + 79). Bought as the Studio Suite, it is $199.00, a saving of $127.00 on the same four licences (arithmetic: 326 minus 199). An extended licence for the suite is $439.00.
Visitora's own description is worth repeating exactly as it stands: it is an evacuation list for reception and site safety, one page naming everyone still inside. It is an operational record, not a legal or fire-safety obligation of any kind, and nothing in this guide is legal advice.
Two design claims worth explaining rather than repeating
Two of the four products here are not just described as doing a job; they are described as being built a particular way to do it, and that is worth spelling out rather than filing under a bullet point.
Slotly is engineered so it cannot double-book. That is a stronger claim than we check for clashes before saving, and the difference matters most exactly where a studio actually breaks: two instructors running back-to-back classes off one online booking page, a client hitting refresh at the same moment the front desk is entering a walk-in by hand. A system that validates on save is inspecting a state after it has already been written; it catches a clash once both bookings exist, if it catches it at all, and a race between two people saving at the same instant is precisely the case that after-the-fact checking is worst at. A system built so the double-booked state cannot exist in the first place does not need to catch anything, because there is nothing there to catch. That is a claim about construction, not an adjective, and it is one you can put pressure on yourself, with two tabs open on the same slot, before you rely on it for a room with more than one instructor.
Waiverly's records are tamper-evident, and there is a minor and guardian gate. A waiver is worth exactly as much as the record behind it, and a record that can be quietly edited after the fact, a date changed, a line added, is worth less than a signature on paper, because the paper at least shows physical signs of having been altered. Tamper-evident means the record itself carries proof of whether it has been touched since it was signed. The guardian gate is the other half of the same idea: it is a workflow that routes the signature to a guardian when the signer is a minor, not a checkbox a front-desk staffer can tick past on a busy Saturday morning. A checkbox can be skipped by anyone in a hurry. A gate the system itself enforces cannot be, and that difference is the entire reason to build it as a gate rather than a tick.
Both of these are claims about how the software is put together, not only about what it does on a features list, and the honest way to weigh a claim like that is to test it rather than take the page's word for it, which is exactly what the free live demo is there for.
What is rented against these two jobs
The suite page itself prints two rented comparisons, one against Visitora's job and one against Gymora's. Both year-one figures are the vendor's own published monthly price multiplied by twelve, and nothing else: the arithmetic assumes the plan never changes across the year, which is an assumption, not a forecast.
| Rented against | Vendor | Monthly | Year one (times 12) | Read on |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visitora's job | Envoy | $362.00 | $4,344.00 | 2026-08-22 |
| Gymora's job | Wodify | $199.00 | $2,388.00 | 2026-09-03 |
Those two reads are twelve days apart, not the same day, and a price read on one date can move by the time anyone checks it again, which is exactly why both dates are printed here rather than folded into one "as of" line. Read the vendor's own current page before deciding anything from either row.
Who should not buy this
Better to say this early, at the cost of a sale, than to let someone find it out after paying. If a studio needs to take card payments at the point of booking, collect class-pack billing automatically, or hand members a mobile app with their own login, this suite is the wrong purchase. These four products are records and a booking engine: a calendar that cannot clash, a waiver that cannot be quietly edited, a membership ledger, and a list of who is in the building. None of them is a payments platform, and none of them is described as one.
The owned side is not free once the licence is paid, either. A self-hosted suite like this needs a server, your own backups, and your own attention to updates, three ongoing jobs that a rented subscription folds into its monthly fee and this suite does not. Buying the licence buys the software. It does not buy someone else's server.
One overlap worth checking before buying twice
Visitora also sits inside the Front-Desk Suite, which is $159.00 for four products aimed at a reception desk rather than a studio floor (read 2026-09-07). A gym that has already bought that one owns Visitora and should not pay for it again here, so it is worth checking what is already owned before paying for the same product twice. Every product in the Studio Suite also installs and runs on its own, standalone, at its own single-licence price, so nothing here requires buying all four to get the one that is actually missing.
The decision
Four jobs happen at the front of the room in the same order every day: booked, signed, current, counted. The Studio Suite is those four licences for $199.00 against $326.00 bought apart, saving $127.00, with an extended licence at $439.00 for more than one domain. Test the two engineering claims, the booking that is built so it cannot clash and the waiver that is built so it cannot be quietly altered, on the free demo before deciding anything from this page alone. If payments at the point of booking or a member-facing app are what a studio actually needs, that decision has already been made, and it points elsewhere.